Skip to content
PROGRAMME BRIEFING · PEACHLANDPeachland

A new route.Know the details.

Hypothetical example: a Peachland woman in her late fifties who owns a small hospitality group is considering the Gold Card. Her children are grown and she expects to keep an interest in the Canadian business. The useful framing for her is not what the framework costs but what remains her responsibility after the payment is made, because a payment that cannot be recalled concentrates every question into the period before it, and the official material is the only reliable description of what follows. The essential distinction is financial and legal: the contemplated payment is made by the applicant, from the applicant's funds, to the U.S. government. It is not an investment in a business, a fee for a conventional temporary visa, or a payment a company can make in the applicant's place without raising separate questions. A first review should confirm the current official programme materials, determine which underlying immigrant classification is relevant, and assemble personal eligibility evidence before arranging funds. Payment does not remove the need to satisfy every applicable immigration, tax, professional licensing, or family eligibility rule.

Talk about GOLD CARD
Official individual contributionUS$1 million
DHS processing feeUS$15,000
Review date7 September 2026

Start with the GOLD CARD eligibility and application overview

01

The framework as officially described

The current individual framework begins with a nonrefundable $15,000 DHS processing fee and, after successful vetting, an unrestricted $1 million gift to the United States. A successful applicant receives lawful permanent residence through an applicable EB-1 or EB-2 classification only if eligible for permanent residence, admissible and allocated an available visa. Gold Card is therefore a programme framework using existing immigrant classifications, not a standalone conventional visa classification or an EB-5 investment. Its terms must be rechecked on the official programme page immediately before any payment.

02

What does not stop being your responsibility

A payment does not license a business, register a profession or answer a tax question. Anyone who intends to operate a hospitality business in the United States still faces state and municipal licensing, employment law, liquor and food service regulation, and corporate obligations, none of which are touched by an immigration framework. Tax residence is a separate matter again and should be discussed with an accountant qualified on both sides before anything is committed.

03

It is not an investment and must not be described as one

The gift contemplated here is a transfer with nothing expected in return. It creates no enterprise, no job creation obligation and no entitlement to repayment. That is structurally the opposite of the investor programme, where a qualifying amount is placed at risk in a business, must be sustained, must produce jobs and can in principle be returned. Anyone comparing the two should hold that distinction firmly, because it determines what each one can and cannot deliver.

04

Verify immediately before, not at the moment of deciding

A young framework administered under executive action can be adjusted, and the terms that matter are those in force when money moves. Read the official programme page and the executive action directly, confirm family inclusion and charges person by person, and use only the payment channels the programme identifies. Where an adviser's confidence exceeds what the official material says, treat the difference as a reason to pause. Sequence the work so the eligibility analysis comes before any irreversible financial step: identify the claimed immigrant category, compare its evidentiary standard with the applicant's records, verify the official payment mechanics, and only then decide whether the cost and timing fit the household plan. The records that settle the point are personal—qualifications, achievements, employment history, identity and civil documents—not corporate marketing materials. A common mistake is treating the framework as a purchase of residence and overlooking an underlying qualification gap, a spouse or child whose eligibility differs, or a professional licence that remains independently necessary. The practical decision is whether the applicant can support the entire immigration case, not merely whether funds are available.

SOURCES FOR THIS GUIDE

Sources reviewed 2026-09-07. This guide covers a preparation focus; it is not an individual eligibility assessment.

GOLD CARD · PEACHLAND

YOUR QUESTIONS.
A CLEARER START.

KEEP EXPLORING

A LITTLE MORE CLARITY.